Why Is What We Do Better?

Traditional backup methods are often based on an operational expenditure (OPEX) model that requires significant input of time and money.

• Backup is a laborious process of making copies of important data into digital files, while recovery entails immense efforts to retrieve failed or corrupt systems.
• Disaster recovery (DR) management is also expensive, with added costs for hardware, software implementation and other miscellaneous expenses.

 Such methods driven by operational expenditure are not only costly, but also time-consuming. Setting up servers and networks for DR systems needs experts and specialized departments for maintenance, thus often resulting in weeks' worth of CAPEX investments that could otherwise have been invested in other areas of the business operations.

 In view of this, it is understandable why businesses are now keenly investing in automated cloud-based services that offer cost-effective IaaS solutions with quicker response times. By leveraging such advanced technologies and innovative tools, businesses can streamline the entire backup, recovery, and DR management process much more efficiently at lower costs in minimal time spans.

Traditional incremental backups create successive security copies of only the data that has been changed or altered since the last backup. When you need data recovery, you always have to deal with lengthy RTOs (restore and recovery times). Due to these problems, we no longer employ conventional backup techniques and have switched to incremental forever backup methods. 

How FRS Takes Backup?

As the threat of disastrous events continues to increase, proper disaster recovery management is now more important than ever. The most commonly used methods for disaster recovery include backup, replication, failover, and failback.

• With backup, data is periodically copied and stored in a separate location to ensure business continuity should an incident occur.
• Replication automates this process so data can be seamlessly transferred. Failover allows crucial applications or services to be moved to a secondary location in case of an emergency.
• Failback transfers these services back to the primary system when it has been restored. These methods may also extend beyond just computer networks—for example, hardware relocating can also be useful for recovering from physical and environmental disasters.

By leveraging these resilient strategies, organizations encourage reliable business processes and ultimately maximize their survival chances in the face of any unforeseen catastrophes.

FRS uses a single copy cost algorithm, making it simple to achieve higher compression rates.

There is only one backup in this approach, and the backup is transferred continually over time in accordance with the backup policy.

FRS takes a snapshot of the most recent backup state before forwarding it to the most current database state.

As a result, the backup and FRS have compression ratios of up to 60% and 70%, respectively. These results are readily available in client databases.